How Can You Find the Absorption of Only the Fencs2+ in the Standard Solution?
BREAKING – 3 studies published past the CDC, Uk Government & Oxford University find the Covid-xix Vaccines exercise not work
A graduate of Yale University who also obtained a PHD at Princeton Academy and an Medico caste from the John Hopkins Academy Schoolhouse of Medicine has published a paper in which she concludes that mandating the public to have a vaccine is a harmful and dissentious deed because of excellent scientific research papers which clearly demonstrate the vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of Covid-19.
Nina Pierpont (Dr., PhD) published a paper on September 9th analysing various studies that were published in August 2022 which bear witness the declared Delta Covid-xix variant is evading the current Covid-19 injections on offer and therefore do not prevent infection or transmission of Covid-xix.
The Physician of Medicine explained in her published paper that vaccines aim to achieve two ends –
- Protect the vaccinated person against the affliction
- Keep vaccinated people from conveying the infection and transmitting information technology to others.
However, the Doc of Medicine writes that herd amnesty will non exist reached through vaccination considering new inquiry in multiple settings shows that the alleged Delta variant produces very high viral loads which are just as high in the vaccinated population compared to the unvaccinated population.
Therefore, according to Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD), vaccine mandates; such as the 1 now enforced in the UK for all Care Dwelling house staff, take no justification because vaccinating individuals does not stop or even slow the spread of the alleged dominant Delta Covid-19 variant.
Which leads the Physician of Medicine to conclude that natural immunity is much more than protective than vaccination because all severities of Covid-19 illness produce healthy levels of natural amnesty.
Nine Pierpont (Dr., PhD) cites 3 studies whose findings and data support her conclusions and these include a written report published August sixth 2022 in the Centre for Illness Control'southward (CDC) 'Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Study', another report published Baronial 10th 2022 by Oxford University, and a final study published August 24th 2022 which was funded past the Uk Department for Health and Social Care.
CDC Report
The CDC study focused on 469 cases among Massachusetts residents who attended indoor and outdoor public gatherings over a two calendar week menstruation. The results found that 346 of the cases were among vaccinated residents with 74% of them presenting with alleged Covid-19 symptoms, and 1.two% existence hospitalised.
However the remaining 123 cases were among the unvaccinated population with just 1 person existence hospitalised (0.viii%. No deaths occurred in either group. The report also found that viral loads were found to be very similar among the vaccinated and unvaccinated, meaning they were as infectious.
Oxford University Study
The Oxford University study examined 900 hospital staff members in Vietnam who had been vaccinated with the Oxford / AstraZeneca viral vector injection between March and Apr 2021. The entire hospital staff tested negative for the Covid-xix virus in mid May 2022 yet, the start case amidst the vaccinated staff members was discovered on June 11th.
All 900 hospital staff were and then retested for the Covid-19 virus and 52 additional cases were identified immediately, forcing the infirmary into lockdown. Over the next 2 weeks, 16 additional cases were identified.
The study found that 76% of the Covid-nineteen positive staff developed respiratory symptoms, with iii staff members developing pneumonia and 1 staff member requiring iii days of oxygen therapy. Summit viral loads among the fully vaccinated infected grouping were establish to be 251 times higher than peak viral loads establish among the staff in March – Apr 2022 when they were non vaccinated.
Uk Department of Health & Social Intendance Study
The UK Section of Health & Social Care study is an assay of ongoing population wide SARS-CoV-2 monitoring in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and includes measures of viral load among the population.
The report found that viral loads amongst the vaccinated and unvaccinated population are virtually the aforementioned, and much higher than had been recorded prior to the Covid-19 injection gyre-out. The study also constitute that the majority of cases among the vaccinated population were presenting with symptoms when they became positive.
The authors of the report conclude that the Pfizer and Oxford / AstraZeneca injection have lost efficacy against what they merits to be the Delta Covid-19 variant, only they maintain that they are substantially effective at keeping people from becoming infected with the Delta variant in the range of 67% to 80%.
Nine Pierpont (Dr., PhD) rightly asks in her newspaper how they can conclude this when 82% of the random sample of new positive PCR tests in the study were fully vaccinated people.
The Medico of Medicine writes –
'If a vaccine reduces the risk of becoming infected past two-thirds (67%), nosotros would expect the proportion of vaccinated in the positive sample to be less than the proportion of vaccinated in the population.
Say nosotros get-go with 1000 people in the state, of whom we will randomly sample 100. The land is 80% vaccinated. This means that in our sample of 100 we have fourscore vaccinated and xx unvaccinated people.
Permit'south say that the virus has infected ten% of the people across the sampling period, or x total cases. If 8 of the infected are among the vaccinated, and two in the unvaccinated (80% and xx% of the positives, matching the ratio of vaccinated and unvaccinated in the population), the vaccine has made no difference in whether one tin get infected (0% efficacy). If the vaccine is 67% effective, the cases in the vaccinated group would be reduced past 2/three to 2.67 cases, and the total cases would be just 4.67 cases (ii.67 vaccinated and 2 unvaccinated).
This means that merely 2.67/iv.67 or 57% of the cases would be in the vaccinated group, and 43% in the unvaccinated. (We can become back to 10% overall being positive simply using ratios, yielding five.7 cases among the vaccinated and 4.three among the unvaccinated.)
This is why the proportion vaccinated in the infected sample, very close to the proportions vaccinated in the total population, are incompatible with the efficacy numbers generated by the authors.
It appears to me—as in the Massachusetts report—that the vaccine is not decreasing susceptibility to infection at all, and is in reality somewhere between slightly (insignificantly) decreasing susceptibility and slightly increasing susceptibility to the Delta variant.
The Britain report is clear that viral load (and thus infectiousness to others) is much greater with Delta than with Alpha, and that, with Delta, viral load and infectiousness are equal in vaccinated and unvaccinated infected people.'
The above iii studies lead Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD) to conclude in her paper that mandating others to take a vaccine is a potentially harmful, damaging human action.
She writes that since the chief reason of a mandate is to protect others from infection, and these studies prove beyond a shadow of a incertitude that they do not do this, those who mandate the Covid-xix injections may wish to seek legal counsel regarding their culpability and liability for potential long-lasting harm to those whom they pressure level into vaccination with the threat of exclusion from employment, pedagogy or society.
Source: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/09/12/three-studies-find-the-covid-19-vaccines-do-not-work/
0 Response to "How Can You Find the Absorption of Only the Fencs2+ in the Standard Solution?"
Postar um comentário